Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content Volume 11 Issue 1 - July 2019

Ultrasound imaging of fallopian tube ectopic pregnancies a life-threatening condition

 

Rupesh Mandava1*, Anant Madhukarrao Bhuibhar2, Arvind Nanda3, Bhawna Dev4

 

1,2Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Great Eastern Medical School And Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

3Senior Consultant, Department of Radiology, B L Kapoor Hospital, Newdelhi, INDIA.

4Professor, Department  of Radiology, Department of Radiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education And Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

Email: rupeshmandava@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Ectopic pregnancy is the implantation of the embryo at any site other than the intrauterine endometrial cavity. The fallopian tube is the most common site of ectopic pregnancies and accounts for almost about 95% of the ectopic pregnancies. Other locations include the caesarian scar, cervical, interstitial, ovarian, intra abdominal, intramural and heterotopic. The ectopic pregnancies account for about 2% of the total pregnancies but however they are the first cause of the mortality due to pregnancy related causes in the first trimester. The incidence of the ectopic pregnancies is also on the raise due to the increase in the number of patients undergoing treatments for infertility. Ultrasound has classic imaging findings in cases of ectopic pregnancies and a thorough knowledge of these imaging findings helps in early and accurate identification thereby significantly reducing the mortality and morbidity caused due to the complications of ectopic pregnancies. The ultrasound findings are to be correlated in correlation with the clinical and lab findings for accurate diagnosis

Key Word: Ectopic pregnancy, Ultrasound, Fallopian ectopic, First trimester ultrasound

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Incidence of ectopic pregnancies has risen significantly in the recent past with the risk factors being history of previous ectopic pregnancies, pelvic inflammatory disease, tubal surgeries, infertility treatments, smoking, endometriosis and congenital uterine anomalies1,2. When there is implantation of the blastocyst outside the uterine endometrium; it results in an ectopic pregnancy1. Imaging, clinical and lab evaluation in suspected cases of ectopic pregnancies; helps in the reduction of mortality and in the preserving the fertility for future When patients present with history of pain in the lower abdomen , amenorrhea of about 5-9 weeks and history of bleeding/ spotting the use of ultrasound will help in early identification of ectopic pregnancies3,4. If a first trimester patient presents in shock or with symptoms of shoulder pain the possibility of a ruptured ectopic pregnancy is most likely. The use of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound and correlation with the beta human chorionic gonadotrophin(β- hCG)is of paramount value in the early diagnosis. The misconception that the size of an ectopic pregnancy correlates with the severity of pain does not hold true and the pain may actually reduce if there is rupture of the ectopic pregnancy4. Sometimes the tubal ectopic pregnancies continue to bleed slowly through the fimbrial end of the tube and may present with large hemoperitoneum

Imaging On Ultrasound: Although transvaginal ultrasound is the preferred imaging modality; a transabdominal ultrasound is always important to identify the presence of fluid in the upper abdomen; the presence of which with an adnexal mass lesion warrants an emergency surgery. When the β- hCG levels are greater than 2000 mIU/ml the gestational sac should usually be seen on a transvaginal scan ; however when the gestational sac is not seen in the uterine cavity it necessitates a detailed search for the presence of an extra uterine pregnancy or adnexal mass5. The most common location of the ectopic pregnancies is in the fallopian tube which constitutes almost 95 % of the ectopic pregnancies. Of these about 70 % occur in the ampulla , 12 % in the isthmus and about 11.1 % in the fimbrial region6,7.

The most common imaging presentation of a fallopian tube ectopic pregnancy is that of a adnexal mass lesion which is separate from the ovary. The presence of a yolk sac, gestational sac or cardiac activity is almost confirmatory for ectopic pregnancy8,9,10. Specific signs like tubal ring sign(Presence of a hyperechoic ring around the gestational sac) and ring of fire sign (High velocity low impedance flow around the adnexal mass / ectopic pregnancy) are useful for localization and identification of the ectopic pregnancy11 In the presence of ectopic pregnancy ; normal or trilaminar endometrium or the presence of a pseudogestational sac(thick decidual reaction around the intrauterine fluid) may be seen in the uterus. The pseudogestational sac also needs to be separated from the gestational sac based on the central versus eccentric location respectively12. The presence of fluid with internal echoes in the morrison's pouch, pelvis or in the region of the fallopian tube can be indirect signs. In heterotopic pregnancy there is evidence of intra and extra uterine pregnancy. The incidence of heterotopic pregnancies is on the rise due to the increase in the assisted reproductive technology and ovulation induction for various problems causing infertility13. The incidence of heterotopic pregnancy raises from 1 in 30000 to 1-3 in 100 in cases of spontaneous conception versus assisted reproduction14. Visualization of the ectopic pregnancies in patients who undergo assisted reproductive therapy can be difficult sometimes due to the presence of enlarged ovaries secondary to hyper stimulation15. The identification of heterotopic pregnancy is important because the non identification of the intrauterine pregnancy and treatment of the ectopic pregnancy can cause loss of the viable intrauterine pregnancy which in most cases is a precious pregnancy whereas the missing of an ectopic pregnancy in cases with intrauterine pregnancy can cause life threatening haemorrhage.


 

OBSERVATIONS AND CASES

CASE 1

Presented with a history of positive urine pregnancy test(UPT), 8 weeks by dates ,no previous ultrasound , complaints of right hypochondriac pain with stable vitals with a requisition to see for gallbladder calculi and also for the fetal heartUltrasound abdomen showed large amount of free fluid in the hepatorenal and spleenorenal areas and the pelvis(FIG.A). Uterus was empty (FIG.B).Fetal heart was seen in the right adnexal region onb-mode which was confirmed with color Doppler (FIG C).TVS confirmed the findings and showed a dilated tube like structure to the right side of the pelvis with fetal pole within (FIG D). Also seen was a right ovarian corpus luteal cyst (FIG E). An ultrasound diagnosis of right fallopian tube ectopic pregnancy was given which was confirmed on surgery.

1

2

 

CASE 2

Patient presented with history of positive UPT and chronic lower abdominal pain from 6 months post diagnostic laparoscopy for ectopic pregnancy in the fallopian tube.She gave a history that the fetus was removed but she continued to have occasional lower abdominal pain .Ultrasound pelvis and TVS revealed an empty uterus(FIG F), normal ovaries(FIG G) but heterogenous echoes; probably retained products was seen in the right fallopian tube(FIG H).A diagnosis of chronic ectopic pregnancy of the fallopian tubes was made

3

 

CASE 3

Patient presented with history of left iliac fossa pain. Urine pregnancy test was not done.USG abdomen was done which revealed free fluid in the abdomen (FIG I). USG pelvis and TVS were done which showed an empty uterus, normal ovaries and a left adnexal mass in which was seen with an irregular cytic structure appearing like an irregular gestational sac (FIG J) was seen.Sonologically a diagnosis of left adnexal ectopic probably fallopian tube was made.On follow-up of the patient the obstetrician had informed than it was a ruptured ectopic pregnancy in the left fallopian tube.

 

4

 

CASE 4

Patient presented with history of right iliac fossa pain, removal of copper T device the same morning and LMP 10 days back stable vitals.Patient had been referred by the consulting surgeon as? acute appendicitis.On doing an ultrasound abdomen a large amount of free fluid was seen in the morrison's pouch, spleenorenal area.Ultrasound pelvis followed by TVS was done which revealed free fluid(FIG K) and empty uterine cavity(FIG L) with normal ovaries( FIG M). The right adnexal region showed a mass with an irregular gestational sac(FIG N).A sonological diagnosis of right adnexal ectopic pregnancy was given. The patient was transferred to the OBG/GYN department who operated the patient later and confirmed our findings. The patient had an unruptured ectopic pregnancy in the right fallopian tube.

5

CASE 5

Patient presented with right lower abdominal pain and was on treatment for infertility with and USG abdomen was done which revealed free fluid in the abdomen with thick internal echoes(FIG O).USG pelvis and TVS were done which showed a gestational sac with yolk sac in the uterine cavity(FIG P) corresponding to about 5 weeks anda right adnexal mass(FIG Q) was seen .Both ovaries were enlarged and showed changes of hyperstimulation(FIG R).Sonologically a diagnosis of intrauterine gestation with right tubal ectopicwas made. Diagnostic laproscopy was done and the right fallopian tube ectopic was operated upon and the intrauterine gestation was continued.

6

CONCLUSION

All the patient's presented with complaints of abdominal pain [Hypochondrium, Right Iliac Fossa, Left Iliac Fossa, Pelvis]. If patients had been treated conservatively it could haveproven fatal for the the patient This shows the importance of suspecting an ectopic in a patient with abdominal / pelvic pain in patients with irregular/regular menstrual cycles in the reproductive age Ultrasound has classic imaging findings in cases of ectopic pregnancies and a thorough knowledge of these imaging findings helps in early and accurate identification thereby significantly reducing the mortality and morbidity caused due to the complications of ectopic pregnancies. The ultrasound findings are to be correlated in correlation with the clinical and lab findings for accurate diagnosis

 

REFERENCES

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ectopic pregnancy: United States, 1990–1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995; 44: 46–48.
  2. Lozeau AM, Potter B. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. Am Fam Physician 2005; 72: 1707–1714.
  3. Lipscomb GH, Stovall TG, Ling FW. Nonsurgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1325–1329.
  4. Attar E. Endocrinology of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 779–794.
  5. Levine D. Ectopic pregnancy. Radiology 2007;245: 385–397
  6. Bouyer J, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Job-Spira N. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year populationbased study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3224–3230.
  7. Webb EM, Green GE, Scoutt LM. Adnexal mass with pelvic pain. Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42: 329–348.
  8.  Dialani V, Levine D. Ectopic pregnancy: a review. Ultrasound Q 2004; 20: 105–117.
  9. Atri M, Leduc C, Gillett P, et al. Role of endovaginal sonography in the diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. RadioGraphics 1996; 16: 755– 774.
  10.  Blaivas M, Lyon M. Reliability of adnexal mass mobility in distinguishing possible ectopic pregnancy from corpus luteum cysts. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 599–603.
  11. Pellerito JS, Taylor KJ, Quedens-Case C, et al. Ectopic pregnancy: evaluation with endovaginal color flow imaging. Radiology 1992; 183: 407–411.
  12. Bhatt S, Ghazale H, Dogra VS. Sonographic evaluation of ectopic pregnancy. Radiol Clin North Am 2007; 45: 549–560.
  13. Ludwig M, Kaisi M, Bauer O, Diedrich K. Heterotopic pregnancy in a spontaneous cycle: do not forget about it! Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 87(1):91–93.
  14. Fernandez H, Gervaise A. Ectopic pregnancies after infertility treatment: modern diagnosis and therapeutic strategy. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10(6):503–513.
  15. Soriano D, Shrim A, Seidman DS, Goldenberg M, Mashiach S, Oelsner G. Diagnosis and treatment of heterotopic pregnancy compared with ectopic pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002; 9(3):352–358.